Why Telcos Assume TRAI’s Caller Title Ought to Not Be Obligatory

Trade physique COAI has contended that implementation of Calling Title Presentation (CNAP) shouldn’t be made necessary however stored non-obligatory for telecom operators, because the affiliation shared technical, privateness and price associated issues with regulator TRAI to argue its level.

The submissions got here as a part of a session course of initiated by Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) on the necessity to introduce the Calling Title Presentation (CNAP) supplementary service within the telecommunication networks.

Put merely, CNAP is a supplementary service which permits the caller’s identify to flash on cellphone screens when somebody calls.

COAI, whose members embrace Reliance Jio, Bharti Airtel and Vodafone Concept, stated “CNAP should not be mandatory and should be optional for the telecom service providers”.

“Implementation of CNAP should be left to TSPs and they may consider implementing the same keeping the market dynamics / business case in mind,” Mobile Operators’ Affiliation of India (COAI) stated.

In its arguments, COAI identified that not all handsets are able to supporting such functionalities. It additionally flagged concern associated to privateness and confidentiality of the nation’s subscriber data.

Provided that handset producers and working system suppliers have management over the info obtained by the CNAP facility, this might end result within the breach of subscriber information privateness because the producers of cellular gadgets and OS suppliers would amass subscriber information for the complete nation, COAI cautioned.

“This would be biggest concern related to privacy and confidentiality of entire country’s subscriber information, which would be akin to building up of name and mobile number database as is in Aadhaar database, with third parties,” COAI stated.

The affiliation needed to know whether or not any research exists on advantages of such a system.

It stated an in depth price profit evaluation ought to be performed earlier than adoption of CNAP “if at all its implementation of CNAP is to be considered in India”.

TRAI should perform a Regulatory Affect Evaluation earlier than popping out with any suggestion, COAI stated.

The trade physique additionally drew consideration to technical complexities concerned in implementation of CNAP and went on to say that this can be very essential that the authority shares the draft suggestion with the trade for feedback and inputs “prior to finalising the same”.

Whereas there are advantages which can be derived by the subscribers from such a service, there are additionally a number of challenges in the direction of its implementation in India, the trade stated.

In its submission to TRAI’s session paper, Reliance Jio stated Calling Title Presentation shouldn’t be a compulsory service, given the restricted availablility of CNAP enabled gadgets in India.

“…CNAP facilities is a good to have supplementary VAS service, however, in a country where over 375 million users (over 350 million mobile non broadband users and over 25 million wireline users) are unlikely to possess a CNAP enabled device, in addition to a sizable portion of the wireless broadband users that may not be possessing CNAP enabled devices as well, it can safely be said that it should not be a mandatory service,” Jio stated.

Jio additionally defined there might be many technical points like elevated load on signalling and doable impression on latency and interconnection associated points, and added “therefore, a cautious approach is recommended.” “There are privacy related concerns with mandatory activation of the CNAP service on every device,” Jio stated.

Given the client privateness issues, the power shouldn’t be mandated and if voluntarily carried out by telcos ought to be based mostly on opt-in consent, Jio stated.

The show of identify on the time of calling can result in numerous social and prison points.

“Therefore, it is imperative that the consent of customer is taken before activating CNAP service on his/her device,” Jio stated.

Jio stated it’s protected to imagine that necessary CNAP activation is not going to survive authorized scrutiny.

“Furthermore, when a large section of telecom subscribers that is users on 2G-3G feature phones, 4G feature phone, smartphones not enabled with CNAP, smartphones requiring major update for CNAP, landline users etc will anyways be not able to avail this service, then the mandatory activation is a moot point and should be avoided,” based on Jio.

Affiliate hyperlinks could also be mechanically generated – see our ethics assertion for particulars.

Leave a Reply

Available for Amazon Prime